Is the World a Utopia or Pandemonium

Utopia is believed to be a world which is ideal. Pandemonium is said to be hell. We are living in a world that is dominated by dogmas and facts. There are people who believe that the world has to be an Utopia and obviously governed and driven by the principles they believe in. They also believe that the world is like a Pandemonium because of the contradicting principles that the other segments hold. We can see people who value dogmas greater than their life ( say fundementalists) and the people who believe that they are led by fact and reason (like the scientists). Concentrating only on the people who are led by dogmas with a religious colouring and people led by cold logic and science, it is conspicuous that both are trying to tip the scales in their favour. Each sect believes that their own principle is true and instead of adoring their principlres, they spend their time in eliinating the anti-principles. There is a minor segment which believes that everyone can coexist in an equillibrium. The funnier aspect of this view is that they fail to recognize that even during the so called tumultuous situations, people are existing. The entire argument is just to say that World is always an Utopian society. Pandemonium breaks out when people hold when people don't realize that they are already in an Utopia. The conclusiopn I draw is Utopia nad Pandemonium are two hypothetical stastes which either don't exsit at all or exist simultaneously in the same place. This is based on the logic that ideally every individual can have his/her own ideas. And some ideas obviously create conflict with other ideas. The general human tendency of asserting ones belief always exists. As long as the tendency exists, some sort of conflict exists. A place with conflicts is nothing but hell (Pandemonium). Got confused??????